Monday, January 28, 2013

Week 2



 Thoughts on the Collins Article

Chris’ article and the Tagg Chapters helped clarify for me some of the questions I had about how a group grade was intended to help us become more learning oriented rather than grade oriented. If I understand the theory correctly, it basically says that by engaging in collaborative learning, students form a community and through this become more engaged in the learning experience and less focused on grades. 

But then I have to wonder, to what extent does this really re-orient us toward learning? We have all participated in group work and know that it does not necessarily result in a more engaging learning activity or greater sense of community, nor does it necessarily shift grade-oriented students toward being learning oriented. In fact, students will often split up group assignments so that they can each do their own parts individually rather than work together, and students often expect individual grades on group assignments. Even when group work or other collaborative learning experiences work well and students are engaged in a high level of cognitive activity and a strong sense of community and forget about the grades for a while, after the activities are over or the class session has finished for the day, they soon return to thinking about their individual grades in the class. 

So perhaps, the only way to go about this properly (short of reforming the whole program as suggested in Tagg) is to do what Chris proposed to us: Commit 100%, and not only assign group activities but a group grade for the whole class as well. In this way students are encouraged to collaborate in one way or another throughout the whole semester, not just for some activities and assignments. At the end of this semester, it will be interesting to see if this approach has worked and we feel that the collaborative learning environment created by the group grade has helped us to focus on learning and forget to be grade-oriented.

What do you think? Am I interpreting the theory correctly? Are there other points that I'm missing?

3 comments:

  1. (Apologies on the lateness of this post. I thought I posted it last week but I guess I only saved it as a draft.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Even though we are participating in this experiment, we are still constrained by the semester time limit. How will our views be changed at the end of the semester when in the fall we go back to the usual individual grading system? Are there any other professors willing to switch over to this type of learning model? One class is a small change, impacting 13 students. Will we advocate for this in our future classes or will it just become a memory?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you have hit on a key issue here. Environment can and does shape behavior, but not absolutely. It is always a blend of individual effort and inspiration. Good thoughts.

    ReplyDelete